Carrying Charges in 2026: How to Amplify Deductions Safely
Interest deductibility remains one of the most misunderstood tools in Canadian personal finance. In 2026, that confusion is costing homeowners and investors real money.
Carrying charges can still be powerful. But the rules have tightened, the audit lens has sharpened, and sloppy execution is what gets people in trouble, not the strategy itself. The goal is no longer “maximize deductions.” The goal is defensible, repeatable, CRA-clean deductions that stand up over time.
Here’s how to think about carrying charges properly in today’s environment.
What Counts as a Carrying Charge (and What Doesn’t)
At its core, a carrying charge is an expense incurred to earn income. In practice, that includes:
Interest on borrowed money used to earn income
Certain investment management fees
Safety deposit box fees for investment holdings
Accounting and legal fees related to income-producing assets
What it does not include is interest tied to personal consumption. The use of funds matters more than the security behind the loan. This is where many strategies fall apart.
If borrowed funds are used for personal spending, renovations for personal enjoyment, or lifestyle upgrades, the interest is not deductible. Full stop.
The 2026 Rule That Still Catches People Off Guard
The CRA’s position has not changed, but enforcement has.
Tracing matters. You must be able to demonstrate a clear link between borrowed funds and an income-producing purpose. That link needs to be clean, consistent, and documented.
Common mistakes that trigger reviews:
Mixing personal and investment funds in the same account
Using a readvanceable mortgage without disciplined segregation
Paying investment expenses from chequing accounts funded by salary
Relying on intent instead of transaction history
If tracing is messy, deductibility becomes discretionary. That is not where you want to be.
Amplifying Deductions Without Increasing Risk
The safest way to amplify deductions in 2026 is not by borrowing more aggressively. It is by structuring better.
Three principles matter most:
1. Segregation of Debt Investment debt should live on its own lane. Dedicated loan segments. Dedicated investment accounts. Dedicated paper trail. When debt is clearly investment-only, deductions are easier to defend and easier to maintain.
2. Consistent Cash Flow Direction Income from investments should flow back toward non-deductible debt or personal expenses. Investment expenses should be paid from investment-specific accounts. Consistency builds credibility.
3. Mechanical Discipline The strongest strategies are boring. Automated. Repetitive. They do not rely on memory, intention, or annual clean-up.
This is why well-structured cash-flow recycling strategies continue to work while improvised versions fail under review.
Audit-Proofing Is a Process, Not a Filing Trick
Most people think audit-proofing happens at tax time. It does not.
Audit-proofing happens when:
Accounts are opened
Loans are segmented
Statements are generated
Transactions repeat the same pattern every month
By the time a tax return is filed, the outcome is largely predetermined.
If a third party can follow the money without interpretation, your position is strong. If it requires explanation, spreadsheets, or storytelling, it is fragile.
The Quiet Shift in CRA Scrutiny
CRA reviews are increasingly pattern-based. They are less interested in one-off deductions and more interested in systemic behaviour.
This does not mean advanced strategies are off-limits. It means execution quality matters more than ever.
The Real Risk in 2026 Is Complacency
Carrying charges still work. Interest deductibility is still embedded in Canadian tax law. What has changed is tolerance for sloppy structure.
The biggest risk today is assuming that what “used to work” still works automatically. It does not.
The investors and homeowners who succeed in 2026 are not more aggressive. They are more precise. They borrow with purpose, document by default, and design systems that do not rely on best-case assumptions.
Done right, carrying charges remain a powerful lever. Done casually, they become an expensive audit conversation.
What separates success from trouble isn’t the strategy itself. It’s how it’s structured.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Readers should consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this content. View our full Disclaimers & Privacy Policy →
Interest deductibility remains one of the most misunderstood tools in Canadian personal finance. In 2026, that confusion is costing homeowners and investors real money.
Carrying charges can still be powerful. But the rules have tightened, the audit lens has sharpened, and sloppy execution is what gets people in trouble, not the strategy itself. The goal is no longer “maximize deductions.” The goal is defensible, repeatable, CRA-clean deductions that stand up over time.
Here’s how to think about carrying charges properly in today’s environment.
What Counts as a Carrying Charge (and What Doesn’t)
At its core, a carrying charge is an expense incurred to earn income. In practice, that includes:
What it does not include is interest tied to personal consumption. The use of funds matters more than the security behind the loan. This is where many strategies fall apart.
If borrowed funds are used for personal spending, renovations for personal enjoyment, or lifestyle upgrades, the interest is not deductible. Full stop.
The 2026 Rule That Still Catches People Off Guard
The CRA’s position has not changed, but enforcement has.
Tracing matters. You must be able to demonstrate a clear link between borrowed funds and an income-producing purpose. That link needs to be clean, consistent, and documented.
Common mistakes that trigger reviews:
If tracing is messy, deductibility becomes discretionary. That is not where you want to be.
Amplifying Deductions Without Increasing Risk
The safest way to amplify deductions in 2026 is not by borrowing more aggressively. It is by structuring better.
Three principles matter most:
1. Segregation of Debt
Investment debt should live on its own lane. Dedicated loan segments. Dedicated investment accounts. Dedicated paper trail. When debt is clearly investment-only, deductions are easier to defend and easier to maintain.
2. Consistent Cash Flow Direction
Income from investments should flow back toward non-deductible debt or personal expenses. Investment expenses should be paid from investment-specific accounts. Consistency builds credibility.
3. Mechanical Discipline
The strongest strategies are boring. Automated. Repetitive. They do not rely on memory, intention, or annual clean-up.
This is why well-structured cash-flow recycling strategies continue to work while improvised versions fail under review.
Audit-Proofing Is a Process, Not a Filing Trick
Most people think audit-proofing happens at tax time. It does not.
Audit-proofing happens when:
By the time a tax return is filed, the outcome is largely predetermined.
If a third party can follow the money without interpretation, your position is strong. If it requires explanation, spreadsheets, or storytelling, it is fragile.
The Quiet Shift in CRA Scrutiny
CRA reviews are increasingly pattern-based. They are less interested in one-off deductions and more interested in systemic behaviour.
Large, recurring interest deductions tied to rising HELOC balances attract attention when:
This does not mean advanced strategies are off-limits. It means execution quality matters more than ever.
The Real Risk in 2026 Is Complacency
Carrying charges still work. Interest deductibility is still embedded in Canadian tax law. What has changed is tolerance for sloppy structure.
The biggest risk today is assuming that what “used to work” still works automatically. It does not.
The investors and homeowners who succeed in 2026 are not more aggressive. They are more precise. They borrow with purpose, document by default, and design systems that do not rely on best-case assumptions.
Done right, carrying charges remain a powerful lever. Done casually, they become an expensive audit conversation.
What separates success from trouble isn’t the strategy itself. It’s how it’s structured.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Readers should consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this content. View our full Disclaimers & Privacy Policy →
Read Next
Managing Turnover Risk: What to Do When Inventory Climbs
The 25% Rule: The Secret Financial Strategy for Canadian Real Estate Professionals
Renewal Readiness: Steps You Should Be Taking Every Five Years
Canada’s 2026 Housing Shift: What Every Homeowner and Investor Should Be Watching